> On Dec. 7, 2013, 3:48 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
> > /branches/1.8/main/pbx.c, lines 4477-4491
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3055/diff/4/?file=49180#file49180line4477>
> >
> >     I don't think we need the extra lock here.
> >     
> >     The purpose of the contexts lock is to prevent changes to the dialplan 
> > while some portion of it is being used. In this case, 
> > pbx_substitute_variables will extract data from the ast_exten object e when 
> > it is called.
> >     
> >     Interestingly enough, variable substitution does not actually need the 
> > ast_exten object. pbx_substitute_variables acts as a wrapper for 
> > pbx_substitute_variables_helper, which is what actually does the work. 
> > pbx_substitute_variables_helper takes in char *.
> >     
> >     The bug here seems to be that we unlock the context lock before we 
> > should. Either pbx_substitute_variables should be removed and the values 
> > extracted in this function, or pbx_substitute_variables should be 
> > responsible for unlocking the contexts lock before calling the variable 
> > substiution function.
> 
> Scott Griepentrog wrote:
>     The pbx_substitute_* functions *can* refer to the ast_exten object's data 
> member, as that's where the expression to evaluate is stored.  This is the 
> very nature of the fault that valgrind is exposing - e->data has been free'd 
> because of a reload operation on another thread before a reference to it 
> occurring during pbx_substitute_variables and functions it calls.
>     
>     This lock accurately and reliably (per testing) prevents this failure.
>     
>     An option to eliminate the need for a lock would be to rewrite 
> pbx_substitute_variables() so that it is passed e->data instead of e, which 
> is the only element it references (and then passes into 
> pbx_substitute_variables_helper()).  Then a copy of e->data could be put 
> locally on stack or other allocation prior to releaseing the global contexts 
> mutex, and then pass it to pbx_substitute_variables().  That could be more 
> performance impacting than the lock, depending on the speed of the lock.  I 
> could run a test to determine which is the higher speed approach.
>

Some of the pbx_substitute_* functions pass pointers from an ast_exten object 
to pbx_substitute_variables_helper_full. However, if you look at 
pbx_substitute_variables_helper_full - which is what actually does the work of 
substituting variables - it doesn't use ast_exten objects. It uses char * to 
set the variable on the channel (or global variable). All other functions are 
just wrappers on getting to that point.

My point is that wrappers around pbx_substitute_variables_helper_full should 
not be passing pointers to data on an ast_exten object to this function. You're 
right that if you do that, you have to have something that protects usage of 
the ast_exten objects while elements stored on them are being manipulated by 
pbx_substitute_variables_helper_full - but if you first copy the data onto some 
other storage location - such as a variable on the stack - then you no longer 
need to hold the contexts lock during this function.

My point still stands: you don't need this mutex. It is duplicating an existing 
lock, and by copying elements off of ast_exten and then calling a variant of 
pbx_substitute_variables_helper_full that takes in char *, you solve the 
problem without introducing more complicated logic.


- Matt


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3055/#review10328
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 6, 2013, 10:44 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3055/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 10:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Matt Jordan.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AST-1179 and AST-1246
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AST-1179
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AST-1246
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> During dialplan execution in pbx_extension_helper(), the contexts global read 
> lock is used prevent changes to the dialplan.  This patch adds a lock between 
> that point and until after the extension previously found is no longer being 
> referenced -- after variable substitution, but before app execution.  This 
> new lock prevents the extension's allocation from being released by module 
> reload when it is still being used in an expression evaluation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/1.8/main/pbx.c 403430 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3055/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testsuite test 'dialplan_stress' (https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3056/) 
> created to isolate this problem and test this fix.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott Griepentrog
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to