-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3796/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated July 17, 2014, 7:29 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Changes
-------
Fixed consistency issues.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24003
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24003
Repository: testsuite
Description
-------
One test checks whether or not when two channels with accountcodes are stored
in a mixing bridge, that the accountcode of one channel gets stored in the
other's peeraccount, and that the LinkedId of the channel that entered the
bridge first replaces the LinkedId of the bridge that entered last. The other
checks that the above conditions do NOT happen when two channels (one with an
accountcode and one without) enter a holding bridge.
Diffs (updated)
-----
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/tests.yaml 5249
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/no_id_propagate/test-config.yaml
PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/no_id_propagate/configs/ast1/extensions.conf
PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/id_propagate/test-config.yaml
PRE-CREATION
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/id_propagate/configs/ast1/extensions.conf
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3796/diff/
Testing
-------
Verified that expected values showed up in the Asterisk log files.
Made conditions that verified that the last step occurred properly in order to
progress the test.
Compared the channels that entered the bridge with one that didn't.
Originally had a python code approach, but then used strictly YAML and ari
pluggable modules.
Thanks,
Christopher Wolfe
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
