----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3903/#review13075 -----------------------------------------------------------
branches/12/res/res_stasis.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3903/#comment23514> This variable is effectively unused. Nothing seems to care about the value set in res. That is unless you actually intend to return the value but forgot to. - rmudgett On Aug. 11, 2014, 1:35 p.m., opticron wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3903/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 1:35 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and Mark Michelson. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > The patch to catch channels being shoehorned into Stasis() via external > mechanisms also happens to catch Announcer and Recorder channels because they > aren't known to be stasis-controlled channels in the usual sense. This marks > those channels as Stasis()-internal channels and allows them directly into > bridges. > > > Diffs > ----- > > branches/12/res/stasis/stasis_bridge.c 420591 > branches/12/res/res_stasis.c 420591 > branches/12/res/ari/resource_bridges.c 420591 > branches/12/include/asterisk/stasis_app.h 420591 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3903/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ensured this patch fixed rest_api/bridges/playback/tones and > rest_api/bridges/bridge_record tests. > > > Thanks, > > opticron > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
