-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/#review13480
-----------------------------------------------------------



/branches/12/main/bridge.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/#comment24000>

    The num_active value is a count of the number of channels that are not 
suspended from the bridge.  This does include the channels that haven't 
completed joining the bridge yet.  If you want to have a correct count of 
active channels on the dummy_bridge, in the move loop you need to:
    if (!bridge_channel->suspended) {
        ++dummy_bridge.num_active;
    }
    
    You would need to do something similar for num_lonely if you think that 
also should be correct on the dummy_bridge.



/branches/12/main/bridge.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/#comment24001>

    Similar here



/branches/12/main/bridge.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/#comment24002>

    This is now the comment for the loop:
    
    Add any new channels or re-add existing channels to the bridge.


- rmudgett


On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:41 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 8, 2014, 11:41 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Right now when a smart bridge operation occurs the bridge provided to the old 
> technology is full of lies. This has the result of making technology 
> implementations more complex because they can't assume the bridge is 
> truthful, resulting in them storing more state than is needed or having 
> additional code paths.
> 
> The attached change makes the bridge provided to the old technology truthful. 
> The bridge will contain all the channels that are actually in the old bridge 
> instead of none. As a result the bridge_native_rtp module can be made a bit 
> dumber and slimmed down. This makes the smart bridge operation, to the old 
> technology, a series of normal leave calls.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/12/main/bridge.c 424413 
>   /branches/12/bridges/bridge_native_rtp.c 424413 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4057/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Performed calls and ran tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joshua Colp
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to