-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/#review14685
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!


branches/13/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/#comment25239>

    You may want to add a comment to the other function detailing that it will 
be placed at the front.



branches/13/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/#comment25240>

    Pedantic: with_name instead of by_name, but that's just me


- Joshua Colp


On March 13, 2015, 5:15 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 13, 2015, 5:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24840
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24840
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make sure that no matter what order the endpoint identifier modules were 
> loaded, priority is given based on the ones specified in the new global 
> 'endpoint_identifier_order' option.
> 
> The original patch for this issue had to be reverted due to some problems it 
> created (original review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4455/).
> 
> However, those problems have now been alleviated with the current patch on 
> this review. Instead of having the associated endpoint identifier name 
> directly contained on the identifier object (part of the externally exposed 
> struct definition) the name is now passed in as part of the register 
> function. The old register function has been left for backwards compatibility 
> or for any modules that don't need to register with a name.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_user.c 432869 
>   branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_ip.c 432869 
>   branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_anonymous.c 432869 
>   branches/13/res/res_pjsip/config_global.c 432869 
>   branches/13/res/res_pjsip.c 432869 
>   branches/13/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 432869 
>   
> branches/13/contrib/ast-db-manage/config/versions/45e3f47c6c44_add_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_order.py
>  432869 
>   branches/13/configs/samples/pjsip.conf.sample 432869 
>   branches/13/CHANGES 432869 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran the testsuite test and it still passed. Modified the test by changing the 
> order of the identifiers and it failed (as it should have).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Harwell
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to