On Fri, Dec 9, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Tomec Martin wrote: > Hi all, > there are still cases, when member is not removed from pending_members, > for example in this issue: > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26621 > There was patch to prevent this (https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/3744/1) > but it does not cover all cases. > For now I think that the most reliable solution would be to add timestamp > and timeout for pending_members entries. > Before writing patch, I would like to ask - have somebody any better > idea?
While this should work eventually, depending on timeout value, I think we need to understand precisely the scenarios where stuff is failing to find the real solution. It may be that the original change just isn't viable and needs to be reverted. -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
