> > > I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P > revisions. > > It is my understanding that the current revision that one > should have > > is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet been able to > verify the > > rev stamped on the board, but zaptel is reporting that I > have the Rev. > > E/F. I just bought this card in January direct from Digium and was > > wondering if I got the wrong Rev. somehow?? I have been having some > > intermittent problems but only thought it was my setup. > > I'm not sure when they came out with the Rev H one. If you > look back at the archives over the last year, you'll see > several people that have had problems and several more that > have not had any problems at all. There does not seem to be > any common ground for those that have had problems. > > Gut feeling (and some rather general comments) tend to > suggest the issue is associated with the pci bus, and > possibly something to do with the TigerJet pci controller on > the card. Best guess is that it has something to do with pci > bus timing issues and that probably is somewhat dependent on > the exact motherboard in use. > > Someone posted a note a few weeks ago that essentially said, > if your tdm card goes out to lunch (every week or two), dump > the tdm registers, and if their all zero's (or 0xff's forget > which), then the card should be replaced. > > The Rev H card _does_ have some additional components on it > close to the TigerJet chip, and the fxo modules are now > marked as x100 (which they were not marked on the originals). > So, something in the design has changed. Hopefully, its an > improvement. :) > > I won't know for another two weeks or so. > > Best bet is to call digium support and let them walk you > through it. It only took about 30 minutes for me last week, > and after I described my problem they offered to RMA it > without saying anything more, and without logging into my > system. Must have been pretty obvious/familiar. >
OK, I just physically checked my card and the card is stamped with REV H but zaptel insists that it is a REV E/F. Could this be causing some inconsistent issues I have been having. Like voice quality and calls from the FXS port just all of a sudden dropping for no reason?? What can I do to insure that zaptel sees it correctly from now on?? Are there really any code differences that make a difference in how the card is detected?? _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
