On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:10:57PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-19 18:35]: > > The spec can be changed, it's just not a great idea to do so > > until we get a critical mass of issues that can't seem to be > > adequately worked around. > > Is anyone keeping a Possible Errata document or some such?
There's one[1] on the wiki. I've updated it with this issue (fallback content) and the other one I can remember (extension attributes on atom:link). 1: <http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/RFC4287Errata>
pgphMfEphq0Lr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
