Hi,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 05:02:59PM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Tim
> Verhoeven<tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Axel Thimm<axel.th...@atrpms.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> I tried to compare with asterisk160-1.6.0.13-7.el5.src.rpm, but the
> >> differences are too big (I think you started off the Fedora imported
> >> package?). Could you check whether the asterisk160 package at ATrpms
> >> has all you need? If not, then I'd rather have all three packages
> >> (asterisk, asterisk160, asterisk14) modified than a version in
> >> between. Thanks!
> >
> > Alright, I will have a look at them and report back if stuff needs to
> > be changed in your versions.
> >
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> I've made a small couple of changes to your version of the package. It
> basically is a couple of directories that are missing. I moved some
> file to the subpackages (that looks cleaner to me) and I've added a
> logrotate configfile that Fedora used. It's all pretty trivial and
> should normally also work for the other versions. Its available at :
> 
> http://people.atrpms.net/~tverhoeven/asterisk160-1.6.0.13-88.el5.src.rpm

Thanks, the changes make a lot of sense. I think they can be applied
to 1.6.1.x unmodified. I'm not sure the logrotate script would also
apply unmodified to asterisk14, but I'll add it, it's better than
nothing and asterisk14 users may suggest improvements later on.

I'll respin all packages and push them up later, thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpYuKSRSdBmK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel

Reply via email to