On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 02:38:07PM +0000, Frederic wrote: > However, since I am dual-booting Linux and Vista, and I already have a working > MikTeX 2.6 installation sur Vista, I was wondering whether it is possible to > use > this installation with my Linux install.
nope. those are windows binaries, which cannot be run under linux. (at least not without installing additional software, and even then it's not certain to work.) > That is, would Emacs be able to find > the executables and the .sty there? emacs doesn't care about .sty files. those belong to latex. emacs just calls the latex binaries. > In your opinion, should I do better in installing TeXLive on my Linux > Partition? yes. > If the answer is yes, should I install TexLive before or after Emacs? On > windows, I am used to install MikTeX before Emacs/Winedt... it's probably a good idea to install auctex *after* installing texlive, but emacs and texlive can be installed in any order. -- Joost Kremers, PhD University of Cologne Institute for German Language and Literature Albertus Magnus Platz 50923 Cologne, Germany Tel. +49 221 / 4703807 _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
