Ken Brown <kbr...@cornell.edu> writes: Hi Ken,
> On 7/23/2012 6:50 AM, Philip Kime wrote: >> The unified diff applies cleanly for me and seems to work fine on the >> current CVS checkout. > > Great. Thanks for testing. I'm also running with your patch. I don't use Biber (yet), but at least it doesn't seem to break anything with respect to the normal reftex stuff. One difference between your and my patch is that with mine, C-c [ <tab> showed a completions buffer when being at the `reftex-citation' prompt. With your patch, <tab> just says [No match]. This feature is in fact broken in the current (unpatched) CVS version, but it works with Philip's version and my patch against CVS trunk. It would be awesome if you could have a look at this. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
