On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:47:23 -0800
Kyle Bader <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've discovered a that if atomic counters are intentionally
> overflowed in patchsets applied to my kernel that the PAX code
> from the grsecurity hardening patch will trigger a refcount overflow
> prevention mechanism. I plan on doing the rediff myself but
> was hoping that you could point me to places in the aufs codebase
> where you might have such counters so I can change them to
> atomic_inc_unchecked variants. 

s/atomic_inc_unchecked/atomic_$foo_unchecked

-- 
Kyle - Dreamhost

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 

Reply via email to