"Chris Engel": > I cannot patch and rebuild my kernel, for the project I'm working on I > need to run on top of binary kernel rpm.
If you have read aufs README file, you would know there are several patches which exports kernel functions. The patch exporting security_inode_permission() is necessary if you are building aufs as a module and CONFIG_SECURITY is enabled. If you cannot patch your kernel, I am afraid you need to copy the function to aufs source files. Additionally you may need to rename the function in order to avoid the name confliction. > > Is work being done on getting that patch into the upstream kernel at > > all? Forcing people to rebuild their kernel to use aufs seems like it > > would be quite a limiting factor in it's adoption. Yes, it is a limitation. But it depends upon your configuration. Junjiro Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
