On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200 Alexander Rødseth <rods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx > instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people > also use ibus. My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at least), and I wasn't able to get it to work. I'm sure people are using it fine, but I feel that the quality of software is limited by its documentation. No documentation = software sucks, end of story. If we move in this direction, I'd like to see someone familiar with fcitx update the wiki accordingly =). Allen Li
