To some extent, there are two separate threads here. This post addresses one aspect only and that is finish rules which encourage high-speed low-level finishes, how ever much fun they are.
>>But it’s not instructive, or fair, to make out that one was foolish where >>others were wise. Right. But are we all foolish to continue with what is a demonstrably risky process. Who knows the stats… In the last two years, how many high-speed low-level finishes and how many accidents and fatalities have we had locally? My guess is something in the region of: 1000 landings 2 accidents 1 fatality. Is that foolish or wise? _______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
