-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/15/2009 12:29 PM: >> As in the following. Any objections to this patch? In addition to adding >> hard failures, it documents and tests AT_CHECK_NOESCAPE, and also tests >> the ability to run post-AT_CHECK cleanup. > > I'm wondering whether s/AT_CHECK_NOESCAPE/AT_CHECK_EXPAND/g would be > good. Even with that, the name makes me think that the macro would do > something different with its first argument, rather than arguments > number three and four. Unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion > to improve this.
Or even AT_CHECK_UNQUOTED, to match the existing naming of AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED. Well, now's the time to make a name change, if any, as part of making it documented. Anyone using the older undocumented interface can update, or even add a shim: m4_ifndef([AT_CHECK_UNQUOTED], [m4_copy([AT_CHECK_NOESCAPE], [AT_CHECK_UNQUOTED])]) - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake e...@byu.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknmPf8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDGHACg1Y3Oy3H4Lems+Err1sUvHoCa A00An0LVqfkN2WYihsYK+1SH5nLE87dz =/peA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----