On the subject of Debian, we could probably get an RC into experimental and ask 
for archive rebuilds and say that we were hoping to get 2.72 approved for a 
bookworm stable update.

zw

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 2:43 AM, Frederic Berat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm also in favor of an RC release, I can then rebuild Fedora packages using 
> the tarball from the tester list and do some kind of A/B testing.
> 
> Fred.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:50 AM Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> > On 2 Feb 2023, at 23:17, Zack Weinberg <z...@owlfolio.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Due to a series of crises with my day job, the earliest I can promise to 
>> > do _anything_ Autoconf related is early March. If you have time to make a 
>> > release before then, please do not wait for me.
>> > 
>> 
>> Sorry to hear Zack, hope you're doing ok. I think your input on the issues 
>> we've been talking about has been enough
>> for us to each a good position for now.
>> 
>> Paul in particular, please let me know if there's something I can do to 
>> help. I'm already giving it the standard rounds of usage
>> in Gentoo. Perhaps we could tag an RC and shove it into the platform-testers 
>> list? It's non-commital so while I'd like
>> to move forward before March for the final release, if in the event you 
>> didn't feel comfortable doing that,
>> we'd at least have made some progress.
>> 
>> Best,
>> sa

Reply via email to