On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:13:41PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > would do the same. > > But is much less obvious. The LOOKUP_FOLLOW flag is the primary reason for > this statement. The rest are subordinate and would be wholly irrelevant if > LOOKUP_FOLLOW was to be removed from the list.
Then keep the LOOKUP_FOLLOW semi-separate as in the original code. But there's absolutely no reason for the goto spaghetti. _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
