"Wouter van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this a (known?) bug or am I missing something?
It's not strictly a bug but a "missed optimization". Could you fill in a bugzilla report on GCC for this? If you replace the "uint8_t" by "unsigned char", no further preprocessing is needed, so you can attacht that example directly to the report. Please do also attach the *generated* assembly code (rather than the disassembly listing), this is what you get by using the -S compiler option. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
