"Weddington, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Agreed, I think both locations (sf.net, or savannah.nongnu.org) >> would do fine.
> I lean towards putting it on WinAVR, mainly because doing file > releases is easier (no GPG key required). Unless you have a > counter-argument, Joerg? As I wrote, I don't care much, so that's fine with me. Btw., savannah no longer strictly requires GPG-blessing anymore, they eventually allowed sftp connections directly into the download area. That also (finally) solved the issue of deleting something (like obsolete or faulty stuff) there. Still, for any major package (source code/executables), a detached GPG signature is for sure increasing the possible trust into the delivery. For plain benchmark results, it probably doesn't matter too much though. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
