Uh, I cut that out of the v10 xmega patch file, changed SPH/L but didn't change the A/B. So yeah, your way looks like it would work :)
-----Original Message----- From: Weddington, Eric [mailto:ewedding...@cso.atmel.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:04 PM To: larry barello; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Anatoly Sokolov Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] WinAvr 20081205 and Xmega AVR > -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of larry barello > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:52 AM > To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: [avr-gcc-list] WinAvr 20081205 and Xmega AVR > > So what should really happen is: > > > > return ( AS2 > (out,__SP_L__,%B1) CR_TAB > > + AS2 > (out,__SP_H__,%A1)); Shouldn't %A1 be in __SP_L__, and %B1 be in __SP_H__, like so?: + return (AS2 (out,__SP_L__,%A1) CR_TAB + AS2 (out,__SP_H__,%B1)); _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
