A note about the use of the trampoline in the AVR256. 
I was in trouble cause a wrong address in the upper 128K using the
trampoline itself due to a linker error (I suppose). At the moment I don't
use EICALL for this reason.
If someone has news about this issue I'm very interested to fix the problem
in my code.
Thank you in advance

Rino Tallarico
_________________________
via Pola 26 - 10135 Torino
tel. +39 347 2261196
mailto: palmerinotallar...@vodafone.it

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: avr-gcc-list-bounces+palmerinotallarico=vodafone...@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+palmerinotallarico=vodafone...@nongnu.org] Per
conto di andrewhutchin...@cox.net
Inviato: martedì 15 dicembre 2009 14.35
A: Sean D'Epagnier
Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Weddington, Eric
Oggetto: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Why are we using EICALL and EIJMP for AVR256?

Thanks, it would be nice if this was documented.

I noticed it when reviewing addressing modes and a omission in call
patterns.

void  (*fptr)();

fptr = main;

(*fptr)();  //Will use EICALL - should be CALL main


which become readily apparent with inlined code.


Andy



---- Sean D'Epagnier <geckosena...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On 12/14/09, Andrew Hutchinson <andrewhutchin...@cox.net> wrote:
> > The patterns for AVR mega 256 use EICALL an EIJMP
> >
> > Both require EIND to be set to provide upper address bits
> >
> > However, we are using linker trampolines for both, so in either case the
> > 16 bit jump or call is to the trampolines.
> >
> > Are not the trampolines always located in first 128Kbytes? Thus we
> > should be using ICALL and IJMP and not needing to set use EIND at all.
> >
> > What have I miss-understood?
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes this confused me a lot too, but the reason is because the
> trampoline is not in the first 128kbytes for a bootloader, so if the
> compiler uses eijmp and eicall, then it is possible to do indirect
> calls there too, but it still works fine in normal code.
> 
> Sean
> 
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> > AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
> >



_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list



_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list

Reply via email to