As Bradley Jarvis wrote: > I am happy to have a look at adding libstdc++ because I am quite > interested in using exceptions, but I won't be able to get around to it > for a few months. ...
> I have noticed that stdlibc++ is located in gcc not glibc, what were > your ideas on implementing? I suppose because of the requirement to > compile for the different avr architectures it should be located in > avr-libc in a directory called libstdc++. No, it's fine to have it in GCC. It requires a two-stage compilation of the toolchain: binutils first, then compiler with C++ support but without libstdc++, then avr-libc, then compiler with libstdc++ once more. It wouldn't make sense for us to rewrite all that as part of avr-libc. avr-libc merely replaces what normally would be the operating system's C library. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
