Follow-up Comment #2, patch #7467 (project avr-libc):
I say yes, but I am biased. It would save me having to add my patch every time
I update avrlibc. And since I use gentoo it would be a bit of a pain to do
this for each update (I currently compile/install avrlibc manually).
c++ support is also mentioned in the avrlibc FAQ, which technically is a gcc
issue since that is where libstdc++ resides.
At the end of the day all it does is add an extra feature avr gcc support that
if not wanted can be compiled out (simply compile library without c++
support).
The C++ support added to the avrlibc compilation files has been done in a
standard way too (not just a hack fix) even if the patch in itself is a hack
fix.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?7467>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
