+1 for removing circular dependencies. Regards Nandika
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think if we are maintaining this shared library in Linux we should also > maintain it in Windows as well. AFAIK here we are having an inconsistency > which we can easily resolve. Also we shouldn't have circular dependencies > like the ones pointed out by Steven in our code. So we can either remove > libaxis2_http_common.la from Linux or add a similar one to the Windows. My > suggestion is to add a similar library to Windows by removing the circular > dependencies. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks > Supun.. > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Steven Nairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Dinesh, > > > > > > Dinesh Premalal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > IIRC , we created libaxis2_http_common in order to separate out common > > > functions that is used by simple_axis_server, mod_axis2, http_sender > > > and http_reciever. > > > > Is this library ever likely to exist in the Windows build? If so, the > > inter-library dependencies between it and libaxis2_engine would (have > > to) be resolved and my problem would go away :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Steve Nairn > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
