Re: Loose-coupling a namespace-to-package binding

[fumitada hattori]

$B=i$a$^$7$F!#(B $BI~It$H?=$7$^$9!#(B
(B
(B> $B!!DZLn$5$s$N9M$($K4p$E$/$H!"FH<+5;=Q(B($B;EMM(B)$B$G(BDLL 
(B> Hell$BLdBj$KBP1~(B
(B> $B$7$h$&$H$7$F$$$k(B.NET$B%3%s%]!<%M%s%H0J30$r(BWeb$B%5!<%S%9$KMxMQ$9$k(B
(B> [EMAIL PROTECTED]&$3$H$G$9$M!#(B
(B
$B$3$l$O!">/[EMAIL PROTECTED];W$$$^$9!#(B ^^;
(B
(B
$B$"$H!"(B
(B> $B!!$O$$!"$=$NDL$j$G$9$M!#FC$K!";d$,%]%$%s%H$H9M$($k$N$O!"2<5-(B
(B> $B5-=R$G$9!#(B
(B> 
(B> $B!Z;EMM86J8![(B
(B>   Client would send a SOAP request that would not be accepted
(B>   (as namespaces do not match), as opposed to client trying to
(B>   send a SOAP request that could be accepted, but improperly
(B>   executed.
(B> 
(B> $B!Z(B($B;29M(B)$BLuJ8![(B
(B>   
(B> $B!!%/%i%$%"%s%H$O!"(B($B%M!<%`%9%Z!<%9$NIT0lCW$K$h$C$F(B)$B%j%/%(%9%H(B
(B>   $B$r5qH]$5$l$k$+$b$7$l$^$;$s!#$^$?!"$=$l$H$OBP>HE*$KMW5a$Ol9g$b$"$k$+$bCN$l$^$;$s!#(B
(B
$B$3$N(B($B;29M(B)$BLuJ8$,$I$3$K5-:\$5$l$F$$$?$b$N$+J,$+$j$^$;$s$,!";29M$9$k$K(B
$BCM$7$J$$Lu$G$9!#(B 
(B
(B> $BITE,@Z$Kl9g$b$"$k$+$bCN$l$^$;$s(B
$B$"$j$^$;$s!#(B
(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]&$+!)(B
(B
$BJ,$+$j$d$9$/Lu$7$^$9$H!"(B
$B%/%i%$%"%s%H$,Aw?.$7$?(BSOAP$B%j%/%(%9%H$O!"