On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: >>> default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static metric >>> 1024 # should I even have a default route at all? >> >> The source on this is actually ::/128 > > You mean ::/0. > >> It is needed for IPv6 packets that originate on the host but where the >> application doesn't specify an address to bind to. > > Yes, it is also needed to ensure interoperability between Babel-S and > stock Babel. (I really wish OpenWRT installed a non-specific route in > that case, by the way.)
? An issue I have had with owrt is that it used route to enter routes, which does not support various tables (like dhcp, or babel-pinger). I think, but am not sure, that netifd in chaos calmer actually calls the routing commands directly now, so that behavior could be more correct. I don't know what udhcp uses... The unreachable syntax was also recently added to netifd, so exporting covering routes has just got easier. see: https://github.com/sbyx/hnetd/issues/23 for details. > > -- Juliusz -- Dave Täht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users