On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Matthieu Boutier <bout...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: >> If you work with atomic route replacement even putting ALL of them >> into a netlink message (or as many as you can fit in) works. > > What I understand is that we can't (in general) work with atomic > *next-hop* replacement (interface index and metric may change).
Interface index is not a problem... metric-change is. > I proposed a workaround where instead of using two distinct messages > for "del(r)" and "add(r)" we use one message with "del(r); add(r)". > Even if it's not necessarily atomic (is it?), it should be faster > (only one system call, since it was what frightened Dave). Henning _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users