On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthieu Boutier <bout...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: >> Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask what's a reliable way to >> detect IPv6_SUBTREES? > > Yes, I'm asking myself if the Dave's "invalid argument" are for > source-specific routes. In which case it answers the question. Will test it.
Yea, a failure to insert these would be a good test for falling back to non-subtrees. ... I uploading to: http://www.taht.net/~d/ babeld.dump-ipv6-subtrees-false babeld_2_wlans.log babled-ipv6-subtrees-false.log I see the invalid argument go by in the subtrees-false case. It was a real joy to be able to just compile stuff directly on these itty bitty boxes, which saved much time vs openwrt. too much time. I do crazy things so others don't have to. ... another possible bug is that I would have assumed the bridged ap box would have detected the bridge and supplied a different metric or cost. I think it is (256) according to the logs, so that is right... The topology there is: pi3 - AP br-lan <wifi> sw10 (fe80::120d:7fff:fe64:c992) (cerowrt connecting as a sta rather than adhoc). Admittedly that connection measures at 80mbits and is probably a great deal less flaky than the pi is. IF you are bored and want access to these boxes let me know. _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users