Firstly I'd echo Tom's sentiment:

>> Strange behaviours surface when you see bbc.co.uk at the end of your email 
>> address; fear of bringing opprobrium to the BBC due to saying the wrong 
>> thing in public can cause otherwise eloquent BBC employees to clam up.

I'm normally happy to shout to the rooftops about what we've been doing, but I 
find myself a bit nervy posting to this list because I know firstly that it is 
populated by a load of very intelligent people, and secondly because anything I 
say, typos and all, is being instantly pinged into the in-boxes of some of the 
colleagues and peers that I respect the most. SO I don't want to say anything 
stupid.


>> - The front page archive.
-----------------------
One of the objectives of Backstage this year is to make as many of the 
submitted prototypes live on bbc.co.uk as we can. The homepage archive is the 
first of these and going live next week. Matthew submitted the idea to 
backstage, we liked it, we contracted (and paid) him to do the work to make it 
live on bbc.co.uk. We'd like and want to do more of this and are looking hard 
at some other contenders. The hold ups aren't the strength of your ideas or how 
they've been presented and I hope that Tom's mail has given you a little bit 
more background in terms of what we think we need. Hurdles are sometimes 
rights, and tricky infrastructure stuff but mostly its persuasion and 
reassurance which as Tom has said perhaps we've been doing too much behind 
closed doors.



Maybe we should have been more forthright about saying that we *were* doing 
this. It has been an interesting challenge not just on the legal/contract side 
but on the product development side. The work to get it running for the BBC 
rather than outside the BBC is being done in my production group. Turning a 
prototype into a beta service with a BBC URL is something we are doing for the 
first time, and suddenly all sorts of considerations come into it. 

Here is just one example, if we know that we are about to do a one-off special 
version of the homepage, which will cause the archive to register every single 
thing on the page changing, and that breaks the templates the archive is 
published in, that isn't a problem for us if it is a backstage prototype hosted 
externally. Once we are doing it *as the BBC* however, suddenly someone 
emailing my team "Your homepage archive didn't work properly over the weekend" 
becomes an email we have to answer. So does that mean the templates of the 
homepage archive have become or should become, a design constraint on the 
homepage itself? So leaving aside the infrastructure considerations, these kind 
of product development decisions are things we frankly haven't done before. And 
they have been fun - I wrote up an initial draft of how to turn the 'prototype' 
into a 'beta product', and one of my Assistant Producers looks to have done a 
great job with Matthew in getting it up and running for us. !
 But that has all taken time, and the work has had to be prioritised against 
the other work in my production area.

We've also been working on generating some new, and hopefully useful feeds - I 
take on board the point about asking you what the BBC wants. When we have them 
properly running on live I'll remember to be vocal about what I was hoping 
might come out of them

all the best,
martin












-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Stone
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:16 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Backstage - Stagnant


Could you /please/ start sending us some sort of 
> ongoing status things on the competition.

We have a short list of three for the (3) prizes and we're now arguing the toss 
about who's gonna win. There's some legal fine detail that we've just sorted. 
So we just need to get in touch with the individuals first and then we'll 
announce it to the list and site. This took longer than I'd hoped. Partly 
because Ben was away and partly because I was crap. That said I'll say again we 
were genuinely taken aback with the quality of the prototypes submitted and 
will feedback in greater detail what we liked and what blew us away to the 
list/site again. I've dropped a note offlist to Leo from MightyTV and I'll do 
the same to the rest of you who entered.

> 
>  giving weekly status reports

Ok we'll give it a go. For now here's whats on the slate..
Tom has filled in as admirably as ever on the bigger picture but here's some 
more detail.
- RSS / APIs
----------------------
Data, data, data. I know this is the key to making backstage work for a lot of 
you and the BBC still has a limited range of data that we can offer for all 
sorts of reasons. However, centrally we now have some live test feeds of the 
popular links within search, jobs, tickets, BBC press releases, complaints, the 
BBC front page and tv pages.  These are relatively small projects but the idea 
for converting them came from suggestions on the list. So thanks for the 
suggestions. Various other content feeds seem to be popping up every few days 
from the rest of bbc.co.uk so we'll let you know as soon as we find out.

We'll also be testing out some of the potential changes to News RSS formats on 
backstage in the next week or so. This is because you lot in the past have been 
consistently helpful in feeding back ideas, spotting errors and suggesting 
stuff so we wanted to share them with you first. For now here are the test 
feeds for jobs and the press office. http://www.bbc.co.uk/home/test/jobs.xml 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/home/test/pressoffice.xml

- The front page archive.
-----------------------
One of the objectives of Backstage this year is to make as many of the 
submitted prototypes live on bbc.co.uk as we can. The homepage archive is the 
first of these and going live next week. Matthew submitted the idea to 
backstage, we liked it, we contracted (and paid) him to do the work to make it 
live on bbc.co.uk. We'd like and want to do more of this and are looking hard 
at some other contenders. The hold ups aren't the strength of your ideas or how 
they've been presented and I hope that Tom's mail has given you a little bit 
more background in terms of what we think we need. Hurdles are sometimes 
rights, and tricky infrastructure stuff but mostly its persuasion and 
reassurance which as Tom has said perhaps we've been doing too much behind 
closed doors.

- Creative Archive Placements.
----------------------------------
This has come up on the list a couple of times in the past week so I'm 
pointing/cross posting you to this announcement from our colleagues working on 
the Creative Archive project. 
http://creativearchive.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2005/10/artistic_archiv.html
They have just announced two 4 month placements (funded by Arts Council England 
and hosted by the BBC). An advert turned up in the Guardian  last Monday for 
artists, creatives, developers who

"will have the opportunity to develop their professional career by undertaking 
research and producing new art works that creatively reuse sound and television 
materials from the BBC Archives. The placements offer specialist support and 
hosting by the BBC. Each of the successful artists will be eligible for a 
bursary of £10,000."


There are 2 placements. One for Unlimited Distribution and one for Unrestricted 
Access. 
http://jobs.guardian.co.uk/browse/arts-and-heritage/arts-and-antiques/vacancy-1026018-1.html
http://jobs.guardian.co.uk/browse/arts-and-heritage/arts-and-antiques/vacancy-1026018-2.html

Basically you will get the chance to play about with the BBC archive. Leave the 
Likely Lads alone please.


-----------------------------------------
So Jim and Graeme and the rest of you who have contributed to these threads, 
thanks for the welcome feedback about what we could and should be doing and are 
not doing. It's a welcome reality check. Thanks for nudging us along.

ta
Jem, backstage team







-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to