On 26/02/07, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26/02/07, vijay chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 26/02/07, Jason Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yes, however if you are using other people's server juice and bandwidth > > then you should pay for it on their terms. Not a big ask. If the banner > > or whatever payment terms they have annoys you, then don't go back. > > If you don't want me to look at your site, on my terms, don't put it on a > public network; otherwise I'll do what I like with what you serve me, > including not taking content (aka adverts)on my PC Perhaps you'd care to publish a list of the IP addresses you're likely to use a web site from, in order that the owners can comply with your requirements, then. I'd be glad too, for one. -- Peter Bowyer
What's that supposed to mean? You're either publishing your content (in whatever format) on a public network or not. Making an exception for a specific person or group of people doesn't make it any less public. If you don't want your users to do with it what they like (i.e. not look at your adverts) don't host it on a public network, host it privately or on a VPN and make the terms of viewing it that people have to watch the ads (not that that will stop people, as already mentioned they'll just download the ads then hide them). Vijay.
