* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 04.10.08 um 16:26 Uhr:
> Hello Marc,
Hello Kern,
>
> I am sorry, but from what you wrote below, I really am not sure what you like
> and what you do not like.
I did not want to confuse you ;)
I assumed that things like WildDir work in Include as well as in
Exclude sections... which is wrong. I confused the things a bit, sorry.
Please read on.
>
> There are two things that need to be decided separately:
>
> 1. Where to place the directive
> - Options section
> - Include section
> - Exclude section
I think this depends on how the directive will work / what you can
do with it:
If you could use it similar to wilddir for example, than it could
be used to include as well as to exclude directories (exclude=yes)
and then it would be best to have the new directive in the Options
section, right?
These examples show how it would work then:
######################################################
# use control file to exclude dirs:
Include {
Options {
Ignore Dir = .no_backup
Exclude=yes
}
File = /
}
or
# use control file to include dirs:
Include {
Options {
Ignore Dir = .please_back_me_up
}
Options {
RegExFile = ".*"
Exclude = yes
}
File = /
}
######################################################
If it will be to much work or not worth the work to put it into the
Options section than I would vote for having it in the Exclude
section as this new directive is about excluding dirs:
FileSet {
Name = xxx
Include {
...
}
Exclude {
Ignore Dir = .no_backup
}
}
because this directive is about excluding directories and not
including then.
>
> 2. The name of the option.
>
> The name of the directive clearly can be different depending on the section
> it
> goes in.
Yes.
We might try some brainstorming here:
# Options section:
Options {
Ignore Control File = .no_backup
Exclude Control File = .no_backup
Ignore Flag File = .no_backup
Exclude Flag File = .no_backup
Ignore Dir Flag File = .no_backup
...
}
# Exclude section:
Exclude {
Control File = .no_backup
Flag File = .no_backup
...
}
>
> Note: the current code that is implemented is probably not suitable to go in
> the Options section. I would need to examine this in more detail to be sure.
Ok.
I am not (yet?) familiar with the bacula source. Otherwise I would
have examined this already :-/
-Marc
--
8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
