Thanks Felix,
ok so i will wait :) Thanks for the RPMs. Felix Schwarz schrieb: > Hi Tim, > > (I'm sending this mail to the public list as this may be of interest for > others, too) > > Tim Schoellhammer wrote: >> Gibt es einen Speziellen Grund das diese rpms nicht in die jeweiligen >> repositories committed werden? > > (English/short: Why aren't these RPMs not part of the {Fedora, RHEL} > repositories?) > > Obviously, Bacula was not important enough for Redhat to include it in > their own repositories (RHEL, Fedora Core) that's why RHEL/CentOS do not > ship them. > > Fedora (Extras) is open for external contributors but I think there are > some issues which prevent inclusion of the given RPM packages (such as > Fedora SPEC file requirements, packaging concerns). The main obstacle is > that nobody did care enough to make the required changes. > > However, some months ago a new effort (with newly created rpms) was > started by Andreas Thienemann and I think this will finally result in > the inclusion of bacula to Fedora Extras and very likely "Extra Packages > for Enterprise Linux" (EPEL). The bug report is: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 > > fs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users