Scott,

Ruhi wrote:
"We believe that the simple habit of thinking about the implications of the 
Writings with the minimum of personal interpretation would eliminate a great 
share of the disagreements that afflict consultation in many communities,"

You replied to Ruhi:
>>In other words the opinions of the Ruhi editors supersede the Scripture 
>>itself?<<

The question I would ask is how does "thinking about the implications of the 
Writings" differ from "personal interpretation"?

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
"Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger" 
-- Abbie Hoffman 


__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Reply via email to