On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 07:21:06PM +0100, Nicolas wrote: > You can find a barry update into my git repository : > > http://repo.or.cz/w/barry/progweb.git > 130cd47bf9f2ac7ce7fd91dbba6b9cccf5d39b0e > > I have merged the bplaybook into the barry head.
Thanks... I found the update in your master branch. > If I remember, you prefer that I write a new Probe Object specific for > playbook device. But in fact, I think, that it's better if we have a > commun Probe Object, then a ProbeBlackBerry and a ProbePlayBook object. > So, ProbeBlackBerry and ProbePlayBook have the same hierarchy. I still think that it belongs outside the Probe class. The purpose of the Probe class is to discover all available BlackBerry devices, and fill a vector of ProbeResult objects to identify them. But ProbePlayBook actually changes the state of the device it finds, and then doesn't add anything to the ProbeResult list. I don't mind if this functionality exists in the Barry library itself. Perhaps Probe should add a ProbeResult for the PlayBook by default, with a flag, to show that it has no database access. Then you could pass this ProbeResult into a PlayBookToNetwork() function, which simply calls the two ControlMsg()'s to do the reset. I suspect that someday soon, the PlayBook *will* have some kind of database access, so Probe adding it to ProbeResult makes sense. But changing modes is outside Probe's scope in my opinion. Wouldn't this make the code simpler? - Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
