David Paleino <d.paleino <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:14:29 +0000 (UTC), Freddy Vulto wrote: > > > [..] maybe we'd better release bash_completion-2 (or ..200902xx) [..] > > I was starting a branch for the release process... what version number you > believe is "sane"? > > I'd start at 1.0, (so as not to be necessarily linked to the bash version), > and > the "date" format is kinda weird to me.
1.0 is fine with me too - better than date format, as long as the major number is going to be increased once we drop bash-2 support. Can you elaborate on which releases you have in mind? Regards, Freddy _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel