On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: > I'd like to suggest that when we complete available options, we'd generally > offer only the long options as completions if an option has a short > option/alias/other counterpart and if it is known that the long option works > well enough (basically if the long option takes no arguments, or takes an > argument that can be separated with space (not only "=", but possibly both), > it is ok). For example, if let's say -f, -F, and --foo are equivalent, we > offer only --foo out of them when $cur = -*.
+1 Hadn't thought of it, but completing one-letter options makes little sense indeed. Freddy Vulto http://fvue.nl _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
