On Wed Mar 14 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: > I am pretty sure that every user who sets > bbdb-message-all-addresses to non-nil would want this patch:
I guess we were not talking about BBDB if every user had not strongly diverging opinions about such things. In that sense, I am rather hesitant to implement a hard-coded binding of a user variable inside such a command. Actually, I went through quite some effort to break down the code in bbdb-mua.el into low-level stuff that I tried to implement as general and flexibel as possible, and the high-level commands that have rather small pieces of code. bbdb-mua-edit-field with a body of 11 lines is actually the biggest one. Of course, these high-level commands provided in bbdb-mua.el do not take advantage of everything that is implemented on the lower level, in particular if you combine them with all permutations of settings for user variables used by these commands. But hopefully the new setup of the code does make it easier to customize the high-level commands the way you want them to be without a need to fiddle with the trickier low-level functions. Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
