On Fri Jul 20 2012 Roland Winkler wrote: > On Fri Jul 20 2012 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > What I'm saying is that it's tricky to use Electric-command-loop without > > introducing bugs because Electric-command-loop presumes that all > > operations will stay within the current buffer, but it does not (help > > to) try to enforce it. So it's a poor API. > > I do not disagree here. I got into all this business because the > Electric-command-loop has been present in old versions of BBDB. But > I would not miss it, if it disappeared. (I do not even know whether > any other BBDB user would miss it. I'll ask on the BBDB mailing > list.)
BBDB uses Electric-command-loop to provide an `electric' version of BBDB. Is anyone using this? Recently Electric-command-loop has been discussed on the bug-gnu-emacs list (see bug#11983), pointing out some basic design flaws it has. Would anyone miss the electric version of BBDB if it was removed completely? Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
