We have an excellent experience with Spamhaus, and as an RBL has the advantage (with most MTAs) that mail is refused rather than discarded, so the sender is aware of the problem and can seek alternative modes of communication.
dan feenberg On Mon, 20 May 2013, Rob Taylor wrote: > I've used Ironport, and I'm looking at some stuff from a company called > Proofpoint. > Ironport works well for us, but seems to have fallen into the just another > product that has category. > I haven't seen any major updates or advancements in the past few years. > > rgt > > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello folks, >> >> I haven't had to touch much spam filtering stuff for a while, but >> we've had a recent increase in spam, so I'm digging back in. >> >> I noticed that Spamassassin's last release was in 2011, which isn't >> encouraging. What's everyone running for spam filtering these days? >> Any particular RBLs that are helpful? Not so helpful? Any new >> shared-hash solutions like Razor? >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> -- >> John Miller >> Systems Engineer >> Brandeis University >> johnm...@brandeis.edu >> (781) 736-4619 >> _______________________________________________ >> bblisa mailing list >> bblisa@bblisa.org >> http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa > > _______________________________________________ > bblisa mailing list > bblisa@bblisa.org > http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa > _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list bblisa@bblisa.org http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
