W dniu 4 stycznia 2010 21:36 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> napisał: > Next there is a lot of code after "b43_nphy_workarounds(dev);" call > that I can not recognize. Let's just take some lines for example: > b43_nphy_reset_cca(dev);
Actually specs still tell about resetting CCA, but that is done (in specs) without call to separated function (just part of init code): 29. Read PHY Register 0x01 and save in val 30. Write val | 0x4000 to PHY Register 0x1 31. Write val & 0xBFFF to PHY Register 0x1 Should I strictly follow specs (put CCA reset directly in init code) or should I keep b43_nphy_reset_cca function and just modify if to match current specs? -- Rafał _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
