W dniu 5 lutego 2010 22:38 użytkownik Gábor Stefanik
<netrolller...@gmail.com> napisał:
> 2010/2/5 Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>:
>> W dniu 5 lutego 2010 18:34 użytkownik Gábor Stefanik
>> <netrolller...@gmail.com> napisał:
>>> 2010/2/4 Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
>>>> index 074b34c..795bb1e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
>>>> @@ -1069,6 +1069,10 @@ static u16 b43_nphy_gen_load_samples(struct
>>>> b43_wldev *dev, u32 freq, u16 max,
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> samples = kzalloc(len * sizeof(struct b43_c32), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!samples) {
>>>> + b43err(dev->wl, "allocation for samples generation
>>>> failed\n");
>>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> Function was somehow designed to return unsigned only. Returning 0
>> means error (see place where we call b43_nphy_gen_load_samples, we
>> check result for 0 there.
>>
>> Is that OK then?
>
> In that case, OK - I thought this could be passed up to userspace handlers.
Thanks for review :)
--
Rafał
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
