> [9] We name interfaces with a 'I' at the beginning of them... Is this point about Java interfaces or conceptual interfaces?
For example, PageFlowConstants is a Java interface, but not really an 'interface' in my opinion. While constants inside of PageFlowConstants may be part of the API between two entities, the PageFlowConstants file itself does not define any methods so it isn't really an API between two entities. On the other hand, SQLSupportConfig does fit my definition of interface but it isn't a 'Java interface'. It is defined as 'public abstract class SQLSupportConfig'. Or does something need to be a Java interface and be externally visible to be a big-I interface? Something else? - jeremiah
