Hi Prashasti. I'm on my phone, so I'll keep it brief. - ditch both 9.8 and 9.11; install 9.18 - why are you forwarding to yourself? 127.0.0.1 - get binary packet captures and look at them in Wireshark to see what's actually going on. - real IPs please. - why use "port xxx"?
Cheers, Greg On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, 12:28 Prashasti Arora, <prashastistud...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application > on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I > have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8 > and the other uses bind9.11. Configuration is also identical for both. > > On the first setup (using bind9.8): the traffic I send gets distributed > uniformly. > On the second setup (using bind9.11): the traffic gets distributed barely. > 99% of the traffic is sent to one VM. > > I have verified that forwarding is working correctly on both, the issue is > not with the application because both VMs on each setup can handle traffic > individually, the firewall is not blocking the queries, and the > configuration is correct. > > This is the zone: > > zone "example.com" IN { > type forward; > forwarders { 127.0.0.1 port xxx; a.b.c.d port xxx; }; > forward only; > }; > > > Please share any other possible solutions. > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users