Looking in my logs today, I found a confusing line:
validating cran.rproject.org/SOA: bad cache hit (rproject.org/DS)
I was trying to figure out what was wrong with my cache, and how BIND
might be able to determine that a cache hit is bad. To do that, it would
need to retrieve the current value and compare it to the value in cache
. . and by the time it has done that, why has it bothered to consult the
cache?
But now I think I may have mis-parsed the line. Maybe it isn't:
bad cache-hit (i.e. Something was wrong with the cached value)
but is instead:
bad-cache hit (i.e. We found what we wanted in the cache of bad
entries)
Can anyone confirm my hypothesis?
--
--
Do things because you should, not just because you can.
John Thurston 907-465-8591
john.thurs...@alaska.gov
Department of Administration
State of Alaska
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
