This is not the place to discuss the merits and/or issues of these BIPs, only whether they should be treated as final.
On Aug 25, 2016 10:51, "Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev" < [email protected]> wrote: > As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge > people don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds > in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all > points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as > final, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns. > > slush > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not something we >> > should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO. >> >> Sorry. That was one "not" to many. >> >> </jonas> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
