On 25 August 2016 14:26:21 GMT-04:00, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev ><[email protected]> wrote: >> If however >> he is planning to use it as a foothold to further compromise your >> company, send spam or similar, he will likely try to avoid these >> tripwires. [...] > >Depends on the value of their activity compared to the value of the >coins. >Spamming doesn't pay much. > >Covert tripwires would obviously be better, but if shared tripwires >allow you to have 100x the funds available it could be a good >trade-off.
Also, having a overt tripwire doesn't preclude having covert tripwires as well. In any case, this all deserves a Standard™ to make sure intruders know where to look to find the funds. Maybe /var/honeypot... _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
