On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote: > This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters > for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1. >
This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together? Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently? _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
