I don't think encouraging mining more transactions is a good idea since
it would promote inefficient transaction patterns. It's more efficient
to send transactions with a high number of outputs/inputs instead of
creating long transaction chains as some services do.
You might consider incentivizing miners to mine blocks that reduce the
UTXO set size the most, or some other metric that promotes efficient
uses of the blockchain.
On 27/03/17 17:12, Btc Ideas via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Add a preference for mined blocks to be the one with more
transactions. This comes into play when 2 blocks of the same height
are found. The first good block mined would be orphaned if it had less
transactions than another. Optionally, have this rule apply to the
current block and the previous one.
This increases incentive for full blocks because a miner thinking the
faster propagation of a smaller block will win him the reward, but
that would no longer be a good assumption.
I read some miners could attack a chain by mining small or empty
blocks. This makes that a little more difficult, but they can still
attack the chain many ways.
Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
