On Monday, February 06, 2012 10:54:25 AM Luke-Jr wrote: > > 769 : Make transactions with extra data in scriptSig non-standard > > If this affects relaying, it will significantly harm the ability to replace > the current spammy "green address" scheme with a sensible extra signature > system. On the miner end, it could significantly harm adoption of such a > system.
FWIW, at least MtGox was OK with the plan to move to non-blockchain-spam 0-confirmation via an extra signature. Why do you ignore this possibility, and merge stuff that will break it? Do you have an alternative solution to the problem of green addresses spamming the blockchain? As I noted in the pull request, stripping extra data has no negative impact on normal transactions, and clients creating these can be written to expect the txnid to change (or simply not care what the txnid is). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
